User Assessment of Standard and Reduced-Size Numeric Keypads

James R. Lewis / David F. Loricchio

Abstract: As technology improves, portable computers become smaller and more compact. A clear design challenge is to provide a system that is as compact as possible without degrading system usability. The keyboard is still the primary input device for compact computers. Previous research has indicated that reduced key spacing adversely affects skilled typing. Therefore, a portable computer system should provide a keyboard with full-sized keys in the primary typing area. The purpose of this study was to determine if reducing key size and spacing adversely affects the usability of a numeric keypad. Skilled keypad operators compared a standard-size numeric keypad to two keypads that had reduced center-to-center key spacing. One of these keypads achieved its reduction primarily by reducing the key spacing. The other reduced both key size and spacing. (Note that the small changes in key size and spacing have little effect on the overall device dimensions of a numeric keypad.) Operators typed numbers faster with and preferred the standard keypad over the keypad with both reduced key size and key spacing. If a numeric keypad is offered as part of a portable computer, every effort should be made to provide full-sized keys. If reduced key spacing is unavoidable, wide keys are preferable to narrow keys.

Keywords: Keyboard input, Hardware development, Numeric keypads, Keypad, Evaluation, Empirical studies

Note: Originally published in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting, 1991, pp. 251-252, (online access).

Republished: G. Perlman, G. K. Green & M. S. Wogalter (Eds) Human Factors Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction: Selections from Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meetings, 1983-1994, Santa Monica, California: HFES, 1995, pp. 230-231.